« Rob Natelson Responds to Ilya Somin on Federal Immigration Power
Michael Ramsey
| Main | Calvin TerBeek Responds to Chris Green (and others) on the History of Originalism
Michael Ramsey »


Joshua Craddock: Does the Fourteenth Amendment Prohibit Abortion?
Michael Ramsey

Joshua J. Craddock (Harvard University, Law School, Students) has posted Protecting Prenatal Persons: Does the Fourteenth Amendment Prohibit Abortion? (Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2017) on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

What should the legal status of human beings in utero be under an originalist interpretation of the Constitution? Other legal thinkers have explored whether a national “right to abortion” can be justified on originalist grounds. Assuming that it cannot, and that Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey were wrongly decided, only two other options are available. Should preborn human beings be considered legal “persons” within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, or do states retain authority to make abortion policy? 

The late Justice Scalia famously argued for the latter position and pledged he would strike down a federal ban on abortion. But is this view consistent with the original meaning of the term "person"? Using originalist interpretive methods, this paper argues that preborn human beings are legal “persons” within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment.

(Thanks to Michael Perry for the pointer).