« The Privileges or Immunities Clause and 1523, Part I: “Nondiscrimination for Me, but not for Thee”?
Chris Green
| Main | Originalism, Nonoriginalism, and War Powers
Michael Ramsey »

04/08/2017

A New Poll on Originalism
Michael Ramsey

From the Pew Research Center: Americans remain divided on how the Supreme Court should interpret the Constitution.  Key finding:

About half of the public (46%) says the U.S. Supreme Court should make its rulings based on its understanding of what the Constitution “meant as it was originally written,” while an identical share says the court should base its rulings on what the Constitution “means in current times,” according to a survey conducted in October. Public opinion about this issue has changed little in recent years.

Republicans and Democrats continue to have very different views about how the Supreme Court should base its rulings: About three-quarters (74%) of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents say it should base its rulings on its understanding of the Constitution’s original meaning, while about a quarter (23%) of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents say the same. This gap is slightly wider than it was in February 2014, when 68% of Republicans and Republican leaners and 27% of Democrats and Democratic leaners said the Supreme Court should interpret the Constitution based on how it was originally written. 

(Thanks to James Phillips for the pointer).