« Seth Barrett Tillman: Six Puzzles for Professor Akhil Amar
Michael Ramsey
| Main | The Contingency of Plainness
Chris Green »

02/20/2013

Neal Goldfarb on Recess Appointments
Michael Ramsey

At LAWnLinguistics, Neal Goldfarb: The Recess Appointments Clause (Part 1).  From the introduction:

The D.C. Circuit’s recent decision regarding the Recess Appointments Clause (Noel Canning v. National Labor Relations Board) bills itself as an exercise in Heller-style textualism: “When interpreting a constitutional provision, we must look at the natural meaning of the text as it would have been understood at the time of the ratification of the Constitution. District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S. Ct. 2783, 2788 (2008).” As a result, much of the decision is devoted linguistic issues.

I’m going to take a look at how the court handled some of those issues—at the conclusion it reached and the reasoning it used to get there.

The verdict: the Recess Appointments Clause is a lot less clear than the D.C. Circuit makes it out to be, and the court’s reasoning isn’t very good.