« Cass Sunstein: Does the Constitution Echo Republican Views?
Michael Ramsey
| Main | Daniel Smyth on the Origination Clause
Michael Ramsey
»

10/21/2012

Jeffrey Kaplan: Unfaithful to Textualism
Michael Ramsey

Jeffrey P. Kaplan (San Diego State University -- Linguistics) has posted Unfaithful to Textualism on SSRN. Here is the abstract:  

Linguistic analysis is applied to the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This one-sentence amendment has a syntactic structure comprising an “absolute” (a non-tensed propositional modifier of a main clause) which conditions the speech act embodied in the main clause. Because the absolute’s proposition (“A well-regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state”) is false, the main clause speech act (prohibition of infringement of the right to keep and bear arms) is unsupported, giving rise to a hard problem: what the Amendment says it does, it doesn’t do, but being law, it does. The linguistic analysis in the majority opinion in D.C. v. Heller (554 U.S. 570 (2008)), authored by Justice Scalia, is analyzed. The analysis shows that Scalia covertly abandoned his own prominently and energetically advocated textualist program. A faithful application of textualism would have resulted in a different outcome in the case.